|
Making Your Harassment Policy Work
Recent court decisions emphasize that it is not enough just to have a
written harassment policy. You also must make sure that it is implemented
in an "effective" manner. This standard means you must be
proactive and take steps to apply your policy properly.
You probably have a sexual harassment policy in place. But, are you
sure that it will protect your organization against legal claims? Is it an
"effective" policy as defined in the Supreme Court’s 1998
decisions? Does it include a complaint and resolution procedure? Have you
trained your employees on how to use it? Does it promote positive employee
relations? Does it cover all forms of harassment, not just sex? If you
answered "no" to any one of these questions, it may be time for
you to review your policy. The Editors have made the job easy by providing
a step-by-step analysis of how to create and implement an effective
harassment policy.
Clear Reasons for a Policy
There are two primary reasons why all employers should have a
harassment policy:
• To create a productive work environment. A strong and
consistently enforced policy against sexual and other forms of harassment
shows your commitment to a productive work environment. Harassment that is
unchecked has the very real potential to debilitate your operations
through decreased morale and productivity and increased employee turnover.
• To prevent liability. Court decisions and guidances from the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) consistently show that you
can decrease your liability for hostile work environment harassment, when
it involves coworkers, by maintaining and enforcing internal policies to
prevent and deal with harassment.
It is, however, more difficult to avoid liability when supervisors are
involved. According to the Supreme Court in Burlington Industries v.
Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998), and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, Fla.,
524 U.S. 775 (1998), if a supervisor’s harassment results in a tangible
employment action (such as termination or discipline), the employer is
always liable. No consideration is even given to factors such as whether
the employer condoned the behavior or took steps to prevent it. However,
if the harassment does not result in a tangible employment action, the
employer can defend itself by showing:
1. It has taken reasonable care to prevent and properly correct sexual
harassment (such as by adopting and disseminating an effective policy and
complaint procedure); and
2. The affected employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of the
preventive or corrective opportunities provided.
What Makes a Policy Effective?
Although the Supreme Court did not spell out specifically what makes a
policy and complaint procedure effective, HR experts agree that the policy
generally should include the following elements:
• A strong statement prohibiting all forms of harassment.
Specifically, you should prohibit sexual harassment and also harassment
based on race, gender, national origin, religion, disability, pregnancy,
age, and military status. In addition, you should include any other
categories protected by your state’s equal opportunity laws (such as
sexual orientation if your organization is in California).
• A definition of harassment, and in particular, sexual
harassment. This section should include the EEOC’s legal definition
of both "quid pro quo" and "hostile environment"
sexual harassment.
• An explanation of what conduct is prohibited. Your policy
should prohibit at least the following conduct:
- quid pro quo threats or promises by a supervisor (loss or promise of
job, promotion, or other employment benefit);
- verbal harassment (lewd comments, sexual jokes or references,
offensive or inappropriate personal questions, or negative comments
based on the person’s protected class status);
- "girlie" or other offensive pictures displayed in the
workplace; and
- offensive or inappropriate written materials (letters, e-mail
messages, or graffiti).
Note that some of the prohibited conduct included above may not
technically be considered illegal harassment by a court or agency, but it
still warrants disciplinary action since it can have a negative effect on
your workplace. For example, you can discipline an employee who uses
obscene language or tells off-color jokes, even though that conduct
generally would not be considered illegal sexual harassment unless the
employee engaged in it on an ongoing basis.
• A viable complaint and resolution procedure. This procedure
should include a bypass mechanism so that an employee does not have to
complain to a supervisor or other person who may be involved in the
harassment. It also should provide for an investigative process and a
specific time frame for resolving complaints. If you already have a
complaint procedure in place that covers workplace problems, you can use
that as long as it includes these safeguards.
• Specific disciplinary procedures. The policy should make
clear the consequences for any employee who violates the policy or who
brings false accusations. For example, it should specify that discipline
up to and including termination may be imposed depending on the nature and
severity of the situation and the number of occurrences.
• A "no retaliation" statement. This reassurance
helps employees trust the policy and believe that they will be protected
if they make a complaint or cooperate in an investigation. However,
employees also must understand that false complaints will be grounds for
disciplinary action. It is important to convey this information in a way
that does not discourage good-faith reports.
Training and Enforcement Is Key
Even the most carefully worded and explicit policy will not prevent
harassment and limit liability if you do not ensure that it is followed in
a consistent manner. To implement the harassment policy properly, you
should:
• Distribute the policy. Make sure all employees receive a
copy. In addition, publish it in any employee handbook or manual and
consider posting it on bulletin boards.
• Select an appropriate person (or persons) to oversee the policy.
Usually this person is an HR manager or other person well versed in
handling harassment complaints.
• Anticipate situations that can develop into harassment. By
analyzing where your organization may be at risk for abuses, you can
allocate resources (such as training) to these areas to help prevent
foreseeable problems. For example, trouble areas may include relationships
between supervisors and their subordinates and the integration of women
into a predominantly male workforce.
• Train supervisors and employees. In particular, explain the
policy and describe specifically what conduct may be considered
harassment, how to use the complaint procedures, and what discipline will
be imposed on employees who violate the policy. In addition, you should
train supervisors as to their particular obligations under the policy and
instruct them to report any incidents of harassment to the designated
contact person.
• Conduct prompt investigations. Take all complaints seriously
and investigate them in a timely manner, generally within a few days.
Interview all involved parties and, to the extent possible, maintain
confidentiality.
• Evaluate the evidence and determine if the policy was violated.
In making a final determination, you should point to as many factual
elements as possible to support your decision. Each reason for the
decision should be documented. Often in harassment complaints, however,
there are no witnesses or other corroborating evidence. In these
situations, you may have to make a decision based on the credibility of
the two parties involved. Remember, you do not have to prove the incident
occurred or did not occur "beyond a reasonable doubt" as a
criminal court does. Rather, your decision should be based on the results
of your good faith attempts to investigate and resolve the complaint.
There may be times when the evidence is inconclusive and a
determination cannot be reached. In these cases, you should resist taking
action against either party. Instead, you should explain to both sides why
the evidence was inconclusive and remind them of their obligations under
the policy to desist from inappropriate behavior and to come forward with
any further complaints.
• Take appropriate remedial action if harassment occurred.
According to recent court decisions, disciplinary action should be
reasonably calculated to stop the harassment. The action should follow
standard disciplinary guidelines, should consider the nature and severity
of the harassment, and should reflect whether the incident is the first
violation of the policy or part of a pattern of harassment. Termination,
while appropriate for cases of severe or ongoing harassment, should not be
the automatic remedial action chosen.
• Communicate the results to the involved parties. The results
should be communicated only to those directly involved and any members of
management with a legitimate need to know. Otherwise, the employer may
face defamation claims. In addition, the complaining employee should be
given the opportunity to appeal the decision. An appeals process lends
additional fairness and impartiality to the decision. Further, you should
follow up on any recommended disciplinary action to ensure that further
harassment has not occurred.
Final Word: Stay on Top of It
The courts are regularly churning out decisions that find fault with
employer harassment policies and set new compliance standards. These cases
clearly demonstrate that having a well-written policy is not enough. You
also need to train your employees as to what the policy prohibits and how
to make a complaint. And, as always, you have to implement the policy
consistently, making sure that all complaints are taken seriously and
resolved quickly and fairly. As a final safeguard, you (and your legal
counsel) should review your policy on a regular basis to ensure that it
still meets the evolving standards of what is a legally effective
harassment policy. These steps will help ensure that your policy both
serves as an effective employee relations tool and provides meaningful
protection from legal liability.
This article is not intended as legal advice. Readers are encouraged
to seek appropriate legal or other professional advice.
For more articles please click here.

|