|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Last month, the Editors tackled the problem of giving references and protecting against defamation claims. This month, we suggest ways you can prevent negligent hiring claims and get more information from your reference checks. Most HR professionals agree that one of the most important methods to verify a candidates past work performance, experience, and overall qualifications is to talk to his former employer. Checking references, however, can be a frustrating process. As we discussed in last months HR Matters, many employers will confirm only basic information about a candidate because they are concerned about defamation or other claims. Employers that do not check up on these references, though, may find themselves with an even bigger problem: negligent hiring claims. To help HR professionals get the most out of their checks, this article explores the negligent hiring threat and gives practical guidance for getting more information about candidates. Prevent Negligent Hiring Claims; Talk to Previous Employers Former employers often are the only source available to verify the candidates actual work experience and abilities, and they may provide information missing from the resume. References also can confirm why a candidate was terminated or reveal past conduct problems, such as work-related incidents involving dishonesty, theft, or harassment. Using this information, employers can make more accurate hiring decisions and, as a result, reduce turnover costs. Even more importantly, these checks can help protect employers against negligent hiring claims. Under the theory of negligent hiring, an employer may be liable for the future violent acts or wrongdoing of its employees if it did not investigate adequately their backgrounds or qualifications. Negligent hiring claims often involve employees who are in a position to pose a threat of injury to the public, such as a driver or deliveryperson, and who subsequently attack an employee or third party, such as a client or customer. To establish negligent hiring, the harmed person generally must show: (1) that the employer did not exercise reasonable care in hiring the employee (for example, by talking to former employers); (2) that the employee had dangerous tendencies which would have been apparent if the employer had exercised reasonable care; and (3) that the employer placed the employee in a position to injure another person. Most successful negligent hiring claims involve extreme and repugnant employee conduct, such as violent attacks by an employee on a customer or elaborate fraud schemes. However, as a general rule, the liability risk of negligent hiring claims far outweighs the inconvenience and resistance employers face in conducting reference checks. Many employers also perform other types of background checks on candidates, including criminal records checks, credit checks, and driving records checks. Generally, these types of checks can provide important information about the candidates integrity, trustworthiness, and ability to perform the job. However, federal and state laws govern the use of these tests, and a full discussion of the restrictions on their use is beyond the scope of this article. Tips to Get Them Talking The need for solid reference information is clear, both from a legal and decisionmaking standpoint. The challenge is to overcome prior employers reluctance to give out the information. Many will verify only a previous employees position and employment dates, because they are worried about potential defamation claims by the former employee. Although these claims typically are difficult to win, the implicit threat of such legal action and big dollar awards is enough to keep employers from volunteering the needed reference information. HR professionals must overcome this obstacle. The Editors asked Contributing Personnel Editor Orlando (Lanny) Blake for his advice on this topic. Mr. Blake is the President of The Blake Group, a California human resources consulting firm. He suggests the following tips for making the most of a reference request: Use reference "experts." To minimize concerns about legal claims arising from these checks, use either an internal "expert" on the topic (typically the HR professional) or contract the job out to consultants or recruiting agencies who have the expertise. Get specific information. Ask the candidate to give examples of past work performance with previous employers. Make it clear you will verify this information, and then use the material to formulate your questions to ask the previous employer. Obtain written releases. Have the candidate give you written authorization to contact former employers and have the form release both you and the former employers from any legal liability based on information obtained during the check. Verify prior employment status. Especially when conducting telephone checks, make sure your contact person is a valid representative of the former employer and that the candidate did in fact work for it. This step may seem elementary, but it weeds out bogus references. Build rapport. Prior to a telephone contact, fax or mail the candidates written waiver and authorization to conduct the check. Give the previous employer your name, position, and telephone number to verify your identity. Emphasize that you want only job-related information about the candidate. In addition, if both of you are in a state with "good faith reference laws," explain that an employer generally will not be held liable for references given in good faith and without malice. Ask targeted questions. Frame questions based on specific examples the candidate provided in the interview process. For example, ask, "This candidate stated she was the design engineer on a project that netted the company $100,000 profit. Can you verify her function and tell me her contributions to the project?" Inquiring, "What are the candidates strengths and weaknesses?" will often yield generalities and little specific information about work habits and behavior. It may even elicit personal information that should not be discussed, at least from a legal standpoint. Verify salary information. Request both the base salary history and any additional compensation as reported on the W-2 form. This information will document the candidates past earnings progression and may signal future compensation expectations. Document all reference responses. Keep an accurate written record of all the reference discussions to support your hiring decisions. Protect confidentiality. Exposure to defamation claims is greatly reduced if the reference information is not disclosed to anyone except decisionmakers within the organization who have a definite need to be involved. If you still cant get anyone to talk ... At a minimum, verify the position held, employment dates, and salary. Document this information and the lack of cooperation in the applicants file. While this limited input will not be of much help in evaluating the candidate, it may protect against negligent hiring claims by showing that you attempted to check the candidates references. Minimize Risk: Ask the Right Questions Reference checking can eliminate undesirable applicants, identify the best candidate, reduce turnover and training costs, and even prevent liability for negligent hiring. However, it is only one of the many necessary elements to making a good hiring decision. You also should check all information on a candidates resume or application, such as educational history, and consider performing other types of background checks if the nature of the job warrants these checks. In addition, skills testing and personality profiling may provide further information on the candidates suitability for the job. All of these steps help you make effective hiring decisions and avoid errors that lead to legal claims. For more information on background investigations, see Hiring, Chapter 202, page 202:10, note 9 and page 202:23, note 19. For more information on credit and consumer reports, see Hiring, Chapter 202, page 202:22, note 18. For more information on good faith reference laws, see Personnel Records, Chapter 901, page 901:10, note 13. For part one of the above article, see "Risky Business: A Guide to Providing References," HR Matters, September 1998. This article is not intended as legal advice. Readers are encouraged to seek appropriate legal or other professional advice.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||